Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 2519 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
 

ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 1996  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 145-148
Initiating a New Renal Transplant Program: Problems and Results


North West Armed Forces Hospitals Program, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

Patients from the North-West area of Saudi Arabia had to travel to Riyadh or Jeddah for renal transplantation and post-transplant follow-up. The administration of the North-West Armed Forces Hospitals Program provided medical expertise and financial support to set up a renal transplant program in this area. Suitable staff members including nephrologists, transplant surgeons, staff nurses social workers and laboratory personnel were recruited. A strong link was established with the Saudi Canter for Organ Transplantation in Riyadh. At the end of two years since establishment, 25 renal transplants (11 cadaver donor and 14 living donor) have been performed. During follow-up, nine patients developed serious infection including pneumonia, wound infection and tubercu­losis; all were managed successfully. Three grafts were lost necessitating graft nephrectomy and there were four deaths. The two-year graft survival is 83.3% and patient survival, 84%. These results are highly satisfactory taking into consideration the fact that our transplant program is new.

Keywords: Renal transplantation, Saudi Arabia.

How to cite this article:
Mansy H, Al-Shareef Z, Shlash S, Filobbos P, Al-Dusari S, Ghasib S. Initiating a New Renal Transplant Program: Problems and Results. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 1996;7:145-8

How to cite this URL:
Mansy H, Al-Shareef Z, Shlash S, Filobbos P, Al-Dusari S, Ghasib S. Initiating a New Renal Transplant Program: Problems and Results. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 1996 [cited 2020 Apr 6];7:145-8. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?1996/7/2/145/39516

   Background Top


It is generally accepted that renal trans­plantation (RTx) is the best form of renal replacement therapy for patients with end­stage renal failure (ESRF) [1]. There was a real need to establish a renal transplant unit in the North-West area of Saudi Arabia and provide a convenient arrangement for patients and relatives alike. This new facility would reduce the need for patients from this region to travel to Riyadh or Jeddah for RTx as well as post-transplant follow-up. This was not only inconvenient but also expensive, in terms of travel costs and time off-work, Establishing a renal transplant program in this region was all the more important considering that there were more than 85 patients on dialysis in Tabuk alone, The administration of the North-West Armed Forces Hospitals (NWAFH) Program took up the issue of providing this service to the military and civilian population of the North-West area of Saudi Arabia. The program provided medical expertise and financial support to undertake such a commitment


   The Foundation Needed to Start a Renal Transplant Program Top


A senior nephrologist with experience in renal transplantation was chosen to be the driving force behind the program. His initial responsibility was to lay the foundation starting with a program of rehabilitation for patients on dialysis in the North-West Armed Forces Hospital and assess their fitness and suitability for RTx. Attention was also given towards improving the compliance of patients not only with medication, but also with regular attendance to the dialysis unit and with fluid and dietary restrictions, with the support offered by an experienced dietitian [2] . The nephrologist would also assess the patients medically while completing their detailed renal transplant evaluation [3] , and help in establishing a strong link with the Saudi Center for Organ Transplant­ation (SCOT) [4] . It was very important to consolidate and improve patient-doctor relationship and confidence in the hospital expertise as a whole.

Great importance was accorded to social support with special attention being paid to socio-economic and marital problems as well as sexual difficulties of the patients with ESRF. An experienced social worker was appointed to talk to the patients and render appropriate help. Also, psycho­logical support was provided for patients on dialysis with the help of an Arabic-speaking psychiatrist, since a fair number of these patients suffer from depression [5] .

The availability of recombinant human erythropoietin helped in reducing the need for blood transfusions in patients, with its attendant risks including the risk of developing cytotoxic antibodies [6] .

Recruitment of an Experienced Transplant Surgeon

The difficulties in recruiting a trained renal transplant surgeon were recognized. The possibility of flying qualified surgical staff in and out of Tabuk was not consi­dered ideal and would hardly be expected to be effective in the long-term. To ensure a continuing successful RTx program, having a Saudi surgeon was considered the best option. Fortunately, two well trained con­sultant surgeons in our institution expressed their keenness to be involved in renal transplant surgery. Initially, a transplant surgeon from Ireland was recruited to provide support to our surgeons who had limited prior exposure to transplant surgery. Since then, these two surgeons have proved to be an asset to the program.

A Program of Education

One of the problems facing the renal trans­plant program was lack of trained nurses with transplant experience. An intensive education program was provided to a selected number of nurses who were keen to be involved with the program. Regular lectures were organized. Also, an intensive course was provided to the ICU nursing staff to facilitate identification and manage­ment of suitable brain-dead patients. The doctor in-charge of the ICU provided adequate medical support to such patients until organ retrieval could be performed.

The local brain-death committee, consisting of an intensivist, nephrologist, neurologist and neurosurgeon have regular meetings in order to consolidate the efforts, both locally in our hospital and in the civilian hospital which accommodates a major ICU depart­ment. The committee members provide help in the diagnosis and management of brain­death.

A team, comprising of a transplant coordi­nator and a religious scholar was created to promote communication with the other hospitals in the area and also help, in coordination with SCOT, to obtain consent for organ donation from relatives of the brain-dead patients. However, great difficulty was faced in the Tabuk area initially in obtaining consent because of lack of public awareness and education. Although a fair number of brain-death cases were reported from our center to SCOT, the number of successful consents for organ donation has been unfortunately disappointing.

An education program was started for the patients, before and after RTx, with emphasis on compliance to medication, clinic attendance, fluid intake, diet, personal hygiene and reporting any side-effects of the medications used.

Tissue Typing Laboratory

It took us some time to establish a tissue typing laboratory. In the first eight months, we had to rely on the laboratory at the Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital for provi­ding tissue typing results, as well as cytotoxic antibody titers. Although, not having this facility in our center caused some difficulty, it did not prove to be a major impediment to launch a transplant program.

Other Support Services

The departments of biochemistry and microbiology are well established in our hospital providing very high standards of service. All the various tests including cyclosporin levels, virus studies and detailed biochemical tests are available locally. The NWAFH Program has allocated the financial support needed to have available all the various immunosuppressive drugs including anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) [7],[8] and monoclonal antibodies (0KT3) [7],[9] .

Radiology Department

We are fortunate to have a state-of-the-art radiology department with a full comple­ment of facilities including computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and isotope scanning. This department is fully equipped with all the necessary imaging techniques needed for a renal transplant program.


   Two-Year Follow-up Results of the New Renal Transplant Program Top


Twenty five patients have undergone RTx (11 cadaveric and 14 living related donor) in our institution till the end of 1994. Their mean age was 35.4 + 1.6 (range 29-62 years); there were 10 females and 15 males.

A total of 18 patients were followed-up for 15.9 ± 1.7 months (range 3-24 months), from November 1992 to November 1994. They were on hemodialysis for 23.9 + 2.7 months before being transplanted. The cause of renal failure was unknown in 15 of these patients, while in one patient each, ESRF was due to chronic glomerulonephritis, chronic pyelonephritis and hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

Following transplantation, 11 patients had hypertension. During follow-up, nine patients developed serious infection requiring hospitalization. Three patients had pneumonia, two patients each had wound infection with abscess formation, and septicemia secondary to ureteric obstruction and one patient each had infected urinary fistula, and pulmonary tuberculosis. All were managed success­fully. Nine others had reactivation of CMV infection, caused by anti-rejection treatment. All were managed successfully with supportive treatment [12],[13] . Three grafts were lost necessitating graft nephrectomy, one each due to accelerated rejection, renal artery stenosis causing significant renal function deterioration and renal artery thrombosis.

The mean number of rejection episodes was relatively low, 1.11 + 0.23 per patient. Consequently, the need for using powerful immunosuppressive drugs like ATG or OK3 was infrequent and was required in only three cases with steroid-resistant rejection. This low incidence of acute rejection episodes could partly be due to the fact that we insisted on good HLA match between donor and recipient. Mean serum creatinine at the end of follow-up was 152.7 + 16.9 umol/1 and mean blood urea was 8.2 + 0.97 mmol/1.

There were four deaths. One patient each died of massive pulmonary embolism, post­operative hemorrhage, graft rupture and hemorrhage, and Staphylococcus aureus Scientific Name Search  septicemia and brain abscess.

The two-year graft survival was 83.3% and patient survival was 84%, results that are comparable with the best from Western European centers [10],[11] . Considering the fact that ours is a new transplant program and there is a learning curve before consoli­dating the transplant clinical experience, these results are encouraging.


   Current Problems Facing the Program Top


Despite constant efforts made by our program as well as by the Ministry of Health, public awareness for organ donation is relatively limited. Thus, intensive education is required in this area. We had a limited success in obtaining consent for organ donation from relatives, although we were able to provide the medical expertise for optimal management of brain-death cases. In this regard, we acknowledge the constant support rendered by SCOT to our program over the past two years.

Unfortunately, the number of cases being referred for living related renal transplantation from the local hospitals in the North-West area has been extremely limited. Taking into account the present hospital resources and the available medical expertise, we feel that we have been under­used. We believe that promoting living related renal transplant will continue to be difficult so long as, buying a kidney abroad is easy and cheap [14] . All efforts are being made to discourage patients from going overseas for commercial renal trans­plantation, as their results are inferior [15] and such form of treatment might involve unethical exploitation of the donor [16] .

 
   References Top

1.Burton PR, Walls J. Selection-adjusted comparison of life-expectancy of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis and renal transplantation. Lancet 1987;l:1115-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Smith MD, Kappell DF, Province MA, et al. Living-related kidney donors : a multicenter study of donor education, socioeconomic adjustment, and rehabilitation. Am J Kidney Dis 1986;8:223-33.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Buszta C, Braun WE, Novick AC, Steinmuller DR. Kidney donor evaluation dialysis and transplantation 1982;ll:296-99.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.The directory of the regulations of organ transplantation in the Kindgom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 1994;5:37-98.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Simmons RG. Long-term reactions of renal recipients and donors. In levy NB (ed) Psychonephrology 2: Psychological problems in kidney failure and their treatment. Plenum, New York 1983; 275.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Schaefer RM, Horl WH, Massry SG. Treatment of renal anaemia with recombinant human erythropoietin. Am J Nephrol 1989;9(5):353-62.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Terasaki PI, Cats S, Cicciarelli JC, et al. Use of monoclonal antibodies for kidney transplant. Transplant Proc 1985; 17:1521.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Thistlethwaite JR, Gaber AO, Haag BW, et al. OKT3 treatment of steroid-resistant renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 1987;43:176-84.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Wechter WJ, Brodie JA, Morrell RM, Rafi M,Schultz TR. Antilymphocyte globulin in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 1990;28:294.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Kramer P, Broyer M, Brunner FP, et al. Combined report on regular dialysis and transplantation in Europe, XII, 1982. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 1982;19:4-8.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Terasaki PI, Toyotome A, Mickey MR, et al. Patient, graft and functional survival rates. Clinical Kid Transplant, UCLA Tissue Typing Lab LA 1985:42-48.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Hibberd, et al. Infectious disease. Approach to immunization in immunosuppressed host (Review) Clin N Am 1990;4:123-42.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Peterson PK, Balfour HH Jr, Marker SC, Fryd DS, Howard RJ, Simmons RL. Cytomegalovirus disease in renal allograft recipients: a prospective study of the clinical features, risk factors and impact on renal transplantation. Medicine-Baltimore 1980;59:283-300.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Daar AS, Salahudeen AK, Pingle A, Woods HF. Ethics and commerce in live donor renal transplantation: classification of the issues. Transplant Proc 1990;22(3):922-4.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Salahudeen AK, Woods HF, Pingle A, et al. High mortality among recipients of bought living-unrelated donor kidneys. Lancet 1990;336 (8717):725-8.   Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Mani MK. Kidney transplantation from unrelated living donors (Letter) N Eng J Med 1986;315:714-16.  Back to cited text no. 16    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Hatim Mansy
Consultant Nephrologist, North West Armed Forces Hospitals Programme, Tabuk
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 18417929

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
    Background
    The Foundation N...
    Two-Year Follow-...
    Current Problems...
    References
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1858    
    Printed71    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded252    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal