Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 1987 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 571-573
Retrospective Analysis of T and B Cells Flow-Cross Matches in Renal Transplant Recipients


Global Hospitals, Lakdi-ka-Pool, Hyderabad (A.P), India

Correspondence Address:
C Lakshmi Kiran
Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Global Hospitals, Lakdi-ka-Pool, Hyderabad–500 004, (A.P)
India
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 18580015

Rights and Permissions

Complement-mediated cytotoxic antibodies in conventional cross match, often result in misappropriation of true positives and borderline positives which are detrimental to allograft survival. Flow cross matches (FCXM) are sensitive to capture even non comple­ment fixing cytotoxic antibodies. This retrospective study evaluates the utility of FCXM in effectively predicting acute allograft rejection. A total of 17 cases were processed for FCXM (T and B cell) of whom seven had no rejection episodes, while the remaining 11 had acute rejection despite negative cross match and panel reacting antibodies being ne­gative (less than 20%). The sensitivity and specificity of the FCXM outcome demons­trated that positive B-cell FCXM has potential to be a good tool in pre-transplant scree­ning. The current analysis proposes the possible utility of B-cell positive FCXM as a more sensitive parameter in predicting acute allograft rejection prior to transplantation.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article  Email this article
    

  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Citation Manager
  Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4024    
    Printed81    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded621    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal