Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 40 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 201-207
The impact of left ventricular preload reduction on cardiac pulsed doppler indices during hemodialysis and its relation to intra-dialysis hypotension: A pulsed doppler study


1 Department of Nephrology, Salmanyia Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
2 Department of Cardiology, Salmanyia Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

Fluid status in the body plays an important role on left ventricular (LV) filling in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on regular hemodialysis (HD), and plays a role in intra-dialysis hemo­dynamic derangement. Fifty-two patients with ESRD on regular HD, including 34 males with a mean age of 45.5 ± 13 years (range 18-72 years), were studied. All patients underwent Echo-pulsed Doppler study before and immediately after a HD session. The Echo Doppler indices noted were: LV cavity dimension and wall thickness, LV ejection fraction (LVEF%), trans-mitral early diastolic filling velocity (E wave), atrial filling diastolic velocity (A wave), E/A ratio, Deceleration Time (DT) of E wave, Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), Aortic Velocity Integral (AVI) and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter (VCD) at expiration. Patients were divided into two groups according to the amount of net ultra filtrate loss after HD. Group I comprised of 25 patients with fluid loss of < 2 liters, and Group II had 27 patients with fluid loss > 2 liters. During the HD session, each patient was observed for the development of acute clinical events such as arterial hypotension (systolic BP less than 90 mmHg), chest pain and arrhythmias. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean values, pre- and post- HD, of reduction of E wave velocity (p< 0.01), the reduction of E/A ratio (p< 0.05), the increment in DT of E wave (p< 0.05), the reduction in AVI (p< 0.01) and the reduction of VCD (p< 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the reduction of A wave velocity and the reduction of IVRT. Among the study patients, 11 (21%) developed systolic hypo­tension during HD. The pre-dialysis mean values of E/A ratio and DT of E wave in patients who developed hypotension compared to those who did not was 0.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.2.1 (p< 0.001) and 246 ± 40 vs 224 ± 34 msec (p< 0.05), respectively. Our study suggests that preload reduction in patients with ESRD on regular HD is directly proportional to the reduction of left ventricle early filling and prolongation of Deceleration Time of E wave. The potential risk of intra-dialysis hypotension can be predicted, if LV diastolic Pulse Doppler pre­dialysis E/A ratio is less than 0.7 and Deceleration Time of E wave is more than 246 msec. Careful assess­ment of these patients is crucial to prevent hypotension, especially if a large preload reduction is required.

Keywords: Doppler, Hemodialysis, Hypotension

How to cite this article:
Alarrayed S, Garadah TS, Alawdi AA. The impact of left ventricular preload reduction on cardiac pulsed doppler indices during hemodialysis and its relation to intra-dialysis hypotension: A pulsed doppler study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2009;20:201-7

How to cite this URL:
Alarrayed S, Garadah TS, Alawdi AA. The impact of left ventricular preload reduction on cardiac pulsed doppler indices during hemodialysis and its relation to intra-dialysis hypotension: A pulsed doppler study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2009 [cited 2014 Oct 25];20:201-7. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2009/20/2/201/45522

   Introduction Top


Maintaining optimal fluid status in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on regu­lar hemodialysis (HD) is crucial to avoid cir­culatory complications. [1],[2] One of the common clinical manifestations of hemodynamic instability during HD is hypotension. The incidence of asymptomatic reduction in blood pressure during HD is in the range of 15-50%, which may contribute to increase in the morbidity among this patients. [3] Thus, the dialysis pres­cription should be individualized and designed to achieve optimal fluid status in the patients.

Pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography plays an important rule in the evaluation of the dias­tolic filling pattern of the left ventricle (LV). There are different types of cardiac filling pa­terns that have been described in various di­seases such as hypertension, which is asso­ciated with abnormal relaxation pattern (Type I), and dilated cardiomyopathy, which is asso­ciated with restrictive filling pattern (Type IV). [4] Various parameters of Pulsed Doppler indices have been used to evaluate diastolic function in patients with ESRD including trans­mitral diastolic filling velocity which reflects filling dynamics of the left atrium (LA) and has been shown to be load dependent in sub­jects with various cardiac diseases. [5]

Measurement of dry weight is a common approach to design fluid management for pa­tients with ESRD on regular HD. [5] Quantitive measurements of preload reduction on the LV Doppler velocities in systole and diastole is not a common practice in these patients. Also, the relationship of these measurements to the changes of systolic blood pressure during HD has not been adequately investigated.

The aim of this study was to assess the fo­llowing:

  1. to examine the effect of net volume ultra­filtrate loss (measured by the HD machine) during HD on the diastolic and systolic pulsed Doppler indices of LV and the sys­tolic flow of the aortic valve and,
  2. to validate the best derived parameter of Doppler indices in order to predict those patients who may have tendency to deve­lop hypotension during HD.



   Materials and Methods Top


Study population

The study population consisted of 52 patients, 34 male and 18 female, with a mean age of 45.5 ± 13 years. The study was performed in the renal dialysis and cardiac units at the Sal­manyia Medical Complex, Bahrain, over a pe­riod of twelve months.

Inclusion criteria

Patients included are those with ESRD on re­gular HD for more than six months, had normal LV function on echocardiogram with no clini­cal evidence of coronary artery disease based on history, symptoms of angina and normal twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Each pa­tient, before enrolment in the study, signed a consent form. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of both hospitals.

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded from the study if they were not willing to participate, if they had severe mitral or aortic valve disease, if they had LV systolic dysfunction with LV ejection fraction of less than 50% and/or if they were known to have coronary artery disease.

The study protocol

Before entry in the study, each patient under­went detailed clinical evaluation complemen­ted with 12-lead ECG and calculated body mass index (BMI). History of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, hyperlipidemia and current medications were recorded. The study patients were not allowed to take any medications up to six hours before commencement the dialysis session in order to eliminate the effect of the medication on the study outcome.

Overnight fasting blood specimens were drawn from each patient to measure the fasting blood sugar, lipid profile including total cho­lesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride (TG) and hemoglobin level (Hb) levels. Patients were regarded hyperlipidemic if LDL level was more than 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L). [6]

Echocardiogram

Pulsed Doppler echocardiogram was per­formed using Hewlett parker echo system (mode 5500) incorporating a 2.0-2.5 mhz Phase array transducer. The M mode measurements were used for the LV cavity and wall thick­ness, left atrial diameter, and LV ejection frac­tion (EF). Echocardiographic measurements were carried out according to the recommen­dation of the American Society of Echocar­diography. [7] Pulsed Doppler measurements of the LV diastolic velocity were made in the apical four chamber view. They included; E wave of early diastolic filling of LV in cm/s, A wave of the atrial contraction in cm/s, the E/A ratio, isovolumic relaxation time in ms, Dece­leration Time (DT) of the E wave in msec and the Time velocity integral of aortic valve velo­city integral (TVI) in cm. The diameter of the inferior vena cava (VCD) in mm on sub-costal view was obtained at the end of expiration. [8] All the 2-D echo and pulsed Doppler readings were taken as a mean of three consecutive cardiac cycles and were calculated by a second operator who was blinded for the clinical status of the patients.

During a HD session, the heart rate and blood pressure (BP) were recorded for each patient every 15 minutes automatically and monitored for cardiac events such as hypotension (defined as reduction of systolic BP < 90 mmHg), ar­rhythmia or chest pain. Immediately after the HD session, the heart rate, BP, net volume loss of the ultrafiltate in liters and duration of dia­lysis session in hours as measured by the machine were recorded. A second post-dialysis pulsed Echo Doppler echocardiogram was per­formed immediately after the HD session. The measured M mode and 2-D values and pulsed Doppler data were tabulated.

The study population (n = 52) was divided into two groups according to the net volume fluid loss at the end of the dialysis session: Group I, (n = 25) with net fluid loss of less than two liters and Group II, (n=27) with net fluid loss > 2 liters. The clinical data and the echo Doppler data were all tabulated and analyzed for each patient.

Control study

Fifty healthy normotensive volunteers with normal renal function, without history of car­diovascular disease were enrolled as controls for 2-D echo and Pulsed Doppler examination. The findings were compared with those of the study population.

Statistical Analysis

All quantitative values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The two-tailed paired Student's t test was used for comparison of pre- and post-dialysis parameters within the same group. Chi-square analysis was applied for qualitative data. The probability value (P) less than 0.05 was considered significant.


   Results Top


Adult patients with ESRD on regular HD were enrolled into the study; 52 out of 64 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the 12 patients who were excluded four had significant mitral or aortic valve disease, seven had coronary artery disease and/or left ventricle dysfunction on echo and one was not willing to participate. The 52 study patients were divided into two groups: Group I (n = 25) where ultrafiltration was less than two liters at the end of the HD session and, Group II (n = 27) where ultra­filtration was equal to or more than two liters. The characteristics of the whole study popu­lation, the two sub-groups and the control group were comparable and there was no statistical difference between them [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The etiology of ESRD in the study population was diabetic nephropathy in twelve, chronic glome­rulonephritis in ten, interstitial nephritis in ten, lupus nephritis in five, adult polycystic kidney disease in two and unknown in thirteen pa­tients. There was no statistical difference bet­ween Group I and II in regard to age, sex, pre­dialysis heart rate and blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin level, prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia and the duration of the dialysis session [Table 2] and [Table 3]. The hydration status was similar in both groups, as assessed by pre-dialysis measure­ment of inferior vena cava diameter (VCD) which was 10.6 ± 2.5 mm and 10.2 ± 2.9 mm in Groups I and II respectively [Table 3] and [Table 4].

Patients' medications

The medications of each patient were recor­ded. All patients were on oral one alpha and calcium carbonate tablets. Other oral medica­tions were beta blockers in 32, calcium cha­nnel blockers in 38, cholesterol lowering agents (statin) in 14 and alpha blockers in four patients.

Eighteen patients were on oral hypoglycemic drugs and four were on insulin injections.

The LV diastolic velocities

In the study population, the analysis of the LV diastolic Doppler velocities showed three different patterns. The pattern of abnormal re­laxation was found in 40 patients (78%) with E/A ratio reversal of < 1 with prolonged DT of E wave. Pattern of constrictive type was seen in six patients (10%) while in another six pa­tients (10%), a pseudonormal pattern was seen.

Post-dialysis analysis

In Group I, there was no statistical difference between pre- and post- mean values of the blood pressure or heart rate while there was a significant drop in the systolic blood pressure in patients in Group II from 137.7 ± 28 down to 112.7 ± 26 mmHg (p< 0.01) [Table 3] and [Table 4]. The differences between the pre- and post­mean values of the M mode echo parameters were not statistically significant concerning the LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD), septal wall thickness (IVS) and posterior wall thick­ness (PW), in the two groups.

In Group II, there was a significant increment of mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 56.6 ± 6.7% to 60.8 ± 6.4% and signi­ficant reduction in the LV end-diastolic dimen­sion (LVEDD) from 4.6 to 4.28 cm (p< 0.05). The VCD reduced from 10.2 ± 2.9 to 8.4 ± 2.3 mm (p< 0.05) [Table 3] and [Table 4].

The analysis of pulsed Doppler data in Group I showed that the differences between the pre­and post-HD Doppler variables were not sta­tistically significant although there was a trend of velocity reduction noted for all the variables except for the DT [Table 5]. In group II, the difference in the mean values between the post and pre-HD pulsed Doppler variables were of statistical significance in regards to reduction of the mean E wave velocity by 32 mm (42%), E/A ratio by 0.14 and time velocity integral of aortic valve by 6.3 cm (26%). The prolonga­tion of DT of the E wave was significantly high, by 43 ms (18%), as shown in [Table 6].

Left ventricular hypertrophy

The total number of patients with LV hyper­trophy (LVH) shown by the 12-lead ECG was 26 (50%) in the study population. The total number of patients who had LVH on M mode was 36 (69%). All patients, except one, with LVH on M mode had abnormal relaxation pa­ttern on pulsed Doppler.

Clinical events during dialysis

In the study population, 11 patients (21%) developed episode(s) of intra-dialysis hypoten­sion towards the end of the dialysis session. None of them had syncope, giddiness or an­gina. There was no need to discontinue any HD session. There was an episode of atrial fibrillation in one patient.

Among the patients with hypotension, eight patients (8/27, 29%) patients were in Group II and three (3/25, 12%) were in Group I. Ana­lysis of pulse Doppler variables for patients who developed intra-dialysis hypotension from those who did not showed that the mean DT of the E wave was 246 ms ± 40 in Group I vs. 210 ± 15 ms in Group II (p< 0.01) and the E/A wave ratio was 0.7 ± 0.3 in Group I vs 1.01 ± 0.25 in Group II, respectively (p< 0.001).


   Discussion Top


In this study, the impact of preload reduction during HD on the pulse Doppler indices of LV diastolic flow was evaluated. The diastolic flow of the LV was of abnormal relaxation pattern (type I) in 78% of the study population. This finding was seen in the normotensive as well as the hypertensive patients with or without LVH. This suggests that ESRD in itself may be the cause of the abnormal relaxation pattern seen in these patients. Similar findings were observed by other investigators with the repor­ted incidence of abnormal relaxation pattern being 77%. [4],[5]

The pre-dialysis hydration status was similar in both groups as evidenced by the Inferior vena caval diameter on 2-D echocardiogram. The post-dialysis data of M mode echo and Pulsed Doppler indices in the study patients showed a trend towards reduction of all Dop­pler indices except DT of E wave, which was prolonged. In Group II, the reduction in the mean value of E wave velocity, E/A ratio and Time velocity integral of aortic valve (TVI) and the prolongation of DT of E wave were of statistical significance. Such findings have been reported earlier in the literature. [8],[9],[10] The sys­tolic and diastolic Pulsed Doppler velocity reduction in the hypotensive patients in our study population is probably due to the signi­ficant reduction of venous return by 17%, as evidenced by the diameter of the inferior vena cava, in Group II patients. This may suggest that the reduction in the preload during dia­lysis is possibly the main mechanism respon­sible for the development of acute changes in the pulsed Doppler indices.

The mean ultrafilitration volume at the end of HD was 2.9 liters in Group II, which was 2.3 folds higher than in Group I patients. This probably led to a significant reduction in E wave velocity, E/A wave ratio, inferior vena cava diameter and Time velocity integral of aortic valve, in Group II. These findings are in agreement with observations noted in the lite­ rature by others. [4],[5]

The post-dialysis LV end-diastolic dimension was significantly reduced by 0.4 cm coupled with an increment of the left ventricular ejec­tion fraction by 4.2 % in Group II. This is pro­bably due to the reduction of the LV end-dias­tolic volume, which is probably caused by the reduction in the after load and the improve­ment in the emptying of the LV. This was in agreement with others where an overall im­provement of LVEF was noted. [11],[12],[13]

Intra-dialysis hypotension

Hypotension with SBP of less than 90 mmHg was observed in more than 29% of Group II patients, which may be due to reduction of venous return caused by the rapid removal of large volume (> 2.9 liters) during dialysis. One may argue that autonomic dysfunction, which is common among diabetics, may contribute to the episodes of hypotension. [14] However; the intra-dialysis hypotension is most likely of multi-factorial etiology as it was observed in 12% of patients in Group I as well.

Hypovolemia is mostly due the imbalance between the amount of fluid removed and the refilling capacity of the intravascular compart­ment. [15] The most powerful predictors for those patients who had intra-dialysis hypotension were the DT of E wave more than 246 msec and the E/A ratio less than 0.7 on the pulsed Doppler indices. This observation is in keeping with previous reports in the literature. [4],[10],[11] In this study, majority of the patients with intra­dialysis hypotension had abnormal relaxation pattern (Type I) despite the similarity with those who stayed normotensive, with respect to hydration status, LVH and patients with diabetes mellitus. This finding is different from other previous reports where intra-dialysis hypotension was observed exclusively among diabetic patients. [16]

Limitations of the study

Patients with ischemic heart disease, valve disease or low LV ejection fraction for any other reason were excluded in order to elimi­nate potential errors of measuring the Doppler indices; thus, the study represents one portion, but not all, ESRD patients.


   Conclusion Top


Pulsed Doppler data showed that the preload reduction gauged by the net fluid loss during HD is directly proportional to the reduction of LV early diastolic filling velocity and E/A wave ratio. Prolonged DT of E of more than 246 msec and E/A ratio of less than 0.7 on pre­dialysis pulsed Doppler echocardiogram are probably powerful predictors of intra-dialysis hypotension and necessitate careful assessment of the patient, pre-, intra- and post-dialysis, especially on planning large preload reduction.

 
   References Top

1.Hung KC, Huang HL, Chu CM, Yeh KH, Fang JT, Lin FC. Effect of altered volume loading on left ventricular hemodynamics and diastolic filling during hemodialysis. Ren Fail 2004; 26(2):141-7.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Shoji T, Tsubakihara Y, Fujii M, Imai E. Hemo­dialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in haemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2004; 66:1212-7.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Orofino L, Marcen R, Quereda C, et al. Epidemiology of symptomatic hypotension in haemodialysis: Is cool dialysate beneficial for all patients? Am J Nephrol 1990;10:177-9.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Gagliardi GM, Rossi S, Manes MT, et al. Impact of left ventricular patterns and diastolic dysfunction on hemodialysis patients. G Ital Nefrol 2004;21(1):45­50.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Khalfallaha B, Ghodhbane L, Tlili R, Annabi N. Doppler echocardiograohic study of left ventricular diastolic function in haemodialysis patients. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2005;98(1):31-8.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Third report of the national Cholestrol Education program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, eva­luation, and treatment of the high blood cholesterol in adults(adult treatment panel III). Circulation 2002;106:3143.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al. Guideline update for clinical application of echocar­diography-summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography).. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(5):954-70.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Hirayama S, Ando Y, Sudo Y, Asano Y. Improve­ment of cardiac function by dry weight optimization based on interdialysis inferior vena caval diameter. ASAIO J 2002;48:320-5.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Sztajzel J, Ruedin P, Monin C, et al. Effect of altered loading conditions during haemo-dialysis on left ventricular filling pattern. Eur Heart J 1993; 14:655-61.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Sadler DB, Brown J, nurse H, Roberts J. Impact of hemodialysis on left ventricular and right ventricular Doppler diastolic filling indices. Am J Med 1992; 304:83-90.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Shutov AM, Wdigarova OM, Mostykov V. Impact of a hemodialysis session on cardiac function in patients with chronic renal failure. Ter Arkh 2004; 6(9):43-7.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Hung KC, Huang HL, Chu CM, et al. Effect of altered volume loading on left ventricular hemo­dynamics and diastolic filling during hemodialysis. Ren Fail 2004;26(2):141-7.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Turgeman Y, Gottlieb L, Rosenfeld T. Effect of hemodialysis on hemodynamic assessment and car­diac flows determined by Doppler echocardiography. Harefuah 1990;119:59-62.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  
14.Danauer J. haemodialysis-induced hypotension: Impact of technologic Advances. Semin Dial 2004;17:333-5.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.leton CP, Galloway JM, Gonzalez MS, Gaballa M, Basnight MA. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressure using two-dimentional and Doppler echo­cardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease. Additional value of analysis left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocity at atrial contraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1972-82.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Ritz E, Rambausek M, Mall G, Ruffmann K, Mandelbaum A. Cardiac changes in uraemia and their possible relationship to cardiovascular instability on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transport 1990;5:93-7.  Back to cited text no. 16    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sameer Alarrayed
Department of Nephrology, Salmanyia Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, P.O. Box 18725 Manama
Bahrain
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 19237804

Get Permissions




 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2310    
    Printed62    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded500    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal