Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 54 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
 


 
RENAL DATA FROM THE ASIA - AFRICA Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 174-180
Organ donation, awareness, attitudes and beliefs among post graduate medical students


Department of Nephrology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication8-Jan-2010
 

   Abstract 

Organ transplantation is the most preferred treatment modality for patients with end-stage organ disease. There is an inadequate supply of cadaver organs commensurate with need. Health-care professionals are the critical link in augmenting public awareness about organ donation. Their attitudes and beliefs can influence the public opinion. This study aims at understanding the awareness, attitudes, and beliefs among the medical postgraduate students. A total of 123 post-graduates of a medical college hospital in South India participated in the study. A specially de-signed questionnaire was used in assessment. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS Windows version 10.0. The mean age of the postgraduate students was 28.32 ± 3.5 years, 54% were males, 62% belonged to Christian religion, 69% were single, 77% were from nuclear families, 87% had urban background, and 54% were from upper socio-economic strata. About 97% said they were aware of organ donation through media, 23 unders­tood the concept of "cadaver" as "brain-death" and 93% were able to distinguish between brain-death and persistent vegetative state. Eighty-nine percent wished to donate their organs, 77% did not believe in body disfigurement and 87% did not believe in rebirth without the donated organs, if they pledged their organs. Sixty-nine percent were willing to donate the organs of their family members. Eighty percent were willing to receive organs from family and cadaver, 40% were willing to donate a child's organs, 95% did not believe that organ donation is against their religion, 87% disagreed with the notion that doctors would not impart adequate care if they were pledged organ donors and 79% agreed that doctors would not declare death prematurely, if they had pledged their organs during life. There was a statis­tically significant correlation between attitudes, beliefs and demographics. In conclusion, the concept of brain-death was clearly understood by only a small number of medical postgraduate students. They how­ever, had positive attitudes and beliefs towards organ donation.

How to cite this article:
Bapat U, Kedlaya PG, Gokulnath. Organ donation, awareness, attitudes and beliefs among post graduate medical students. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:174-80

How to cite this URL:
Bapat U, Kedlaya PG, Gokulnath. Organ donation, awareness, attitudes and beliefs among post graduate medical students. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Apr 16];21:174-80. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2010/21/1/174/58800

   Introduction Top


Organ transplantation is the most preferred treatment modality for end-stage organ disease and organ failures. [1] It offers a better quality of life and also has better long-term survival be­nefits. Patients deemed fit for transplantation by the transplant team often wait expectantly for a donor organ. The inadequate supply of cadaver organs is especially crucial for heart, lung and liver recipients, since these patients cannot be maintained for long on mechanical devices, un­like patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who can be maintained on dialysis. There is an increasing discrepancy between the number of patients on the waiting list for organ transplan­tation and the available number of deceased donor organs. Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing indicated that in 2004, there were 95,000 patients wait listed for solid organs in the United States, but only 27,000 transplants were performed that year. [2] The statistics from the Indian subcontinent are dismal and only 499 cadaver transplants including heart, liver and kidney have been performed in India from the year 2000 till date. [3] Each year thousands of in­dividuals wait for organs to be donated for trans­plantation. [4] There remains therefore, a great need for increasing organ donation and harnessing of donor organs.

The primary hindrance to a successful de­ceased donor organ transplantation program is the extreme shortage of donor organs. The ca­daver organ donation program in India is still in its infancy and is hindered by the lack of ade­quate awareness about the criteria and guide­lines for declaration of brain-death, among doc­tors. Although the public is accustomed to the idea of donating blood, donation of organs after death continues to be a problem. [5] There is a great need for increasing awareness about organ trans­plantation and organ donation among the general public, beginning with the health-care profe­ssionals who in turn, can motivate the public. Educating health-care professionals about organ donation process appears to be an important factor in maximizing the benefits from the limi­ted organ donor pool. Increasing the donor pool is an important public health issue. One factor that might contribute to this limited availability of donor organs is the lack of knowledge about the legal and procedural details of organ dona­tion. Health-care professionals are the most cri­tical links in the organ procurement process be­cause they are the first individuals to establish relationship with the potential donors' family and to have the opportunity to raise the option of donation. [6]

An assessment of knowledge, attitudes and be­liefs of the postgraduate medical students' to­wards organ donation would help to plan sen­sitization, and increase awareness programs at the postgraduate levels and to propagate know­ledge at the community level in addition.

This is a cross sectional study on organ do­nation with specific emphasis on the level of awareness, attitudes and beliefs among the post­graduate medical students of one of the largest teaching medical institutions in South India.


   Objectives Top


The objectives of the present study included the following:

  1. To understand the awareness about organ donation among the postgraduate students.
  2. To study their attitudes and beliefs with re­gard to organ donation
  3. To assess the correlation between aware­ness, attitudes and beliefs towards organ donation.

   Material and Methods Top


Postgraduate students in all medical specialties at a medical college hospital were listed and those consenting to participate were studied. Out of 143 students, 123 students participated in this cross sectional study. A specially designed self-administered questionnaire consisting of demographic profile and items covering aware­ness, attitudes, and beliefs towards organ dona­tion was prepared and distributed. The respon­dents had to indicate their responses as either yes/no/don't know, or agree/disagree/don't know. Topics related to personal willingness to donate or receive an organ for transplantation, and ob­jections to donation, religious and other beliefs towards donation were studied.

The schedule was pilot tested on a sample of medical postgraduate students for clarity of questions and the time taken to respond. The initial time requirement was 15 minutes. After suitable modification of the schedule, the questionnaire was distributed.

The study was approved by the college ethical committee. Permission was obtained from all the heads of the departments. The respondents were assured about the confidentiality and ethical prin­ciples that would be followed, and the back­ground and purpose of the study were explained before the questionnaires were distributed.

The data collected were analyzed using des­criptive statistics. Test of correlation among attitudes, beliefs and demographics was done using SPSS Windows version 10.


   Results Top


The study population consisted of 143 respon­dents of whom, 123 participated in the study. As shown in [Table 1], the mean age was 28.32 ± 3.50 years; maximum concentration was in the age-group of 27-29 years. There was a near equal distribution between genders. Sixty-two percent belonged to Christian religion, 69% were single, 54% were from upper socio-economic back­ground, 77% were from nuclear families and 87% came from urban background.

[Table 2] and [Figure 1] show that 97% were aware of organ donation and cadaver donation. The audiovisual media such as television (61%), ra­dio (31%), newspaper (60%) and magazines (51%) were the major sources of information about organ donation. As shown in [Figure 2], the concept of cadaver as brain-death was un­derstood only by 23, whereas 53 thought it meant a "dead person" and 25% did not res­pond; the remaining subjects gave a mixed res­ponse. About 63% of students were not aware of any coordinating agency for organ donation.

As shown in [Figure 3] and [Figure 4], 93% could dif­ferentiate between brain-death and persistent vegetative state. The majority of respondents (89%) said they would like to donate their or­gans, while 6% said "no to organ donation" for reasons such as: donation has too many hassles, and that "they would decide when the time comes".

More than 75% of the subjects disbelieved that the body should be cremated without disfigure­ment. Eighty-eight percent did not have the be­lief that the person would be reborn without those organs if they were donated after death and 86% felt organ donation did not cause dis­figurement at funeral. Eighty-three percent did not feel that the organs should go to recipients of their own religion, while 66% felt that the family can decide upon the death, to donate or otherwise.

Ninety-six percent did not believe it is against religion to donate and 97% did not believe that the body needs to be complete for resurrection after death. Sixty-nine percent were willing to donate the organs of their family member in the event of an unexpected death, while 16% said "no to organ donation" for various reasons. Eighty percent were willing to receive an organ from the family as well as from a cadaver do­nor. Seventy-five percent had not yet pledged their organs, although 61% of the respondents had heard of pledging organs while alive.

Eighty-one percent disagreed that organs could be taken even if they had not been pledged ear­lier while 87% did not believe that treating phy­sicians would give less medical care if they had pledged their organs during life and were to be admitted in ICU. Seventy-nine percent said that doctors would not be biased and declare death prematurely, if they have organ donor cards while admitted in the ICU. As shown in [Table 3] and [Table 4], a statistically significant correlation was observed between family type (P= 0.01), income (P= 0.00), domicile (P= 0.02) and attitude. Simi­larly, beliefs and marital status (P= 0.05) and family type (P= 0.03) had a significantly high correlation.


   Discussion Top


Transplant technology continues to improve and organ transplantation has become the treatment of choice for organ failure. [9] Rapid advancement in research pertaining to transplantation of or­gans and tissues have however, failed to meet the increasing demand for donor organs resul­ting in severe shortage of donor organs. The magnitude of organ retrieval for the execution of a successful deceased donor program is hea­vily dependent upon the level of knowledge and attitudes of the medical professionals. The atti­tude of medical students can have far-reaching effects on increasing organ donation and trans­plantation, as they occupy a unique position bet­ween lay public and qualified professionals. [10]

This is a cross sectional study assessing the awareness, attitudes and beliefs on organ dona­tion of 123 postgraduate medical students. There was no gender bias observed in this sample. The respondents belonged to upper socio-economic strata, were from urban background; majority were single and from nuclear families.

Awareness regarding organ donation

A large majority of subjects were aware of organ donation and cadaver donation. The ma­jor source of information was through media, mainly television, radio and newspaper. A simi­lar pattern of frequently cited media sources of organ donation has been reported. [4] In a study on university students in Brazil aiming to assess awareness and opinions about organ donation, it was concluded that there are different opinions and different levels of awareness among stu­dents considering age, religion, and religious practices and level at school. [9]

The concept of cadaver was understood as brain-death by only 25% of the study population. Majority of the respondents understood cadaver as dead body and 20% did not respond. These findings are similar to a study, which concluded that there is a poor understanding of the concept of brain-death and organ donation even among the medical students. [11] The present study group comprised postgraduate medical students from one of the premier medical institutes of the country and it is obvious that education about organ donation is lacking in the medical curri­culum at the undergraduate and the postgra­duate levels. Incorporating this in the syllabus will help in improving awareness about organ do­nation as well as clarifying the various doubts among the students.

Sixty-one percent of the respondents had heard about pledging of organs after death. It was ob­served in this study that the majority of the res­pondents were not willing to pledge their or­gans. The reasons cited were "there had been no opportunity or chance as yet; a need for family consent; no information regarding the same; not considered about death, not thought about do­nation; not yet written a will; not given a com­mitment so far; some of the religious persons had willed for the community". Perhaps increa­sed social and cultural awareness about organ donation in the community could ease the con­fusion, doubts, superstitions and misconceptions in the minds of the public.

The barriers for not donating organs could be due to a number of reasons. Religious beliefs like the body should be cremated without dis­figurement, "a person could be born without those organs if it is donated after death", su­perstitions, influence of social and cultural fac­tors, attitudes, educational status and the fear of being declared dead prematurely if a donor card is signed. [6],[7],[8]

Responses related to attitudes towards organ donation

A large majority (89.0 %) were willing to do­nate their organs, a small percentage of the res­pondents were not willing. The most common reasons cited were: there were too many hassles with regard to the procedure; some of them felt they would decide when the appropriate time arose. Although the respondents were postgra­duate medical students, they might not have felt comfortable discussing or even thinking about death and donation. With regard to the willing­ness to donate the organs of their family mem­bers in the event of an unexpected death and, if they could decide about organ donation, more than half the subjects were willing to donate. About 16.0% were not willing mainly because of reasons such as "they thought it could add on to the survivors' sorrow; they also had to con­sider other family members' wishes; they alone could not decide for other family members; the deceased persons should have expressed their intention of donating their organs after their death." Community involvement and participa­tion in organ donation campaigns can reduce the ambiguity among the family members ta­king the decision to donate their family mem­bers' organs. Additionally they can also have the community sanction for donation.

In this study, majority were willing to accept an organ from the family and cadaver, while 13% were not willing. In a similar study, it was reported that most respondents would be wi­lling to take some form of transplanted organ or tissue if it was needed to maintain life. [12]

Culture and religion play much less prohibi­tive part in determining the level of organ do­nation. There is a desire to be aware of the re­ligious stances so that people can make a more informed decision. None of the religions object to organ donation in principle although in some, there is varying thought. [13] Ninety-six percent of the respondents agreed that religion does permit donation.

There was a statistically significant correlation between attitudes, beliefs and demographics. Subjects coming from nuclear families, high socio-economic strata and urban background had positive attitudes. Similarly, subjects who were unmarried and coming from nuclear fa­milies had positive beliefs.

In conclusion, our questionnaire study suggests that majority of the respondents were aware of organ donation mainly through the audiovisual media, although a small fraction were truly a­ware of the concept of "cadaver" as "brain-death". They however had positive attitudes and beliefs towards organ donation. There was statistically significant correlation between attitudes and de­mographics, beliefs and demographics. This study emphasizes the need for incorporating the topic of deceased organ donation into the medical curriculum.


   Acknowledgement Top


The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation and thanks to Dr. Shobhana G. Na­yak for her suggestions and support in the wri­ting of this article.

 
   References Top

1.Filho MA, Ramalho H, Pires HS, Silveria JA. Attitudes and awareness regarding organ dona­tion in the western region of Sao Paulo. Transplant Proc 1995;27:1835.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.UNOS. Waiting list data: United Network for Organ Sharing 2001.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Cadaver Transplant Registry: From the Mohan Foundations in Hyderabad& Chennai, ZTCC - Mumbai and SORTE --Cochin .ZCCK Bangalore.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Rumsay S, Hurford DP, Cole AK. Influence of knowledge and religiousness on attitudes towards organ donation. Transplant Proc 2003;35(8): 2845-50.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Rene AA, Viera E, Jiles R, Daniels DE. Organ donation awareness: Knowledge, attitude and beliefs in Puerto Rican Population. Transplant Proc 1995;27:1893-96.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Schaeffner ES, Windisch W, Friedel K, Bruitenfeldt K, Wolfgang CW. Knowledge and attitude-organ donation among medical students and physicians. Transplantation 2004;77:1714­8.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Abuksis G, Orenstein S, Hershko A, et al. Cornea recipients: Are their opinions and attitudes toward organ donation different from those of general population? Transplant Proc 2004;36:1249-52.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Ziaja J, Cierpka L, Krol R, Szczepanski MS, Tyryban M, Sketa S. Transplant procedures in social awareness opinion poll of Silesian pro­vince citizens on living donor organ transplan­tation. Ann Transplant 2003;8(4):43-5.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Wig N, Gupta P, Kailash S. Awareness of brain death and organ transplantation among selected Indian population. J Assoc Physicians India2003;51:455-8.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Verma SK. Medical students-Their attitudes to organ donation and transplantation. Nat Med J India 2000;13:46-7.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Edwin AR, Raja D. Attitudes of health care professionals towards organ donation. Indian J Urol 2000;16:98-105.  Back to cited text no. 11    Medknow Journal  
12.Cantwell M, Clifford C. English nursing and medical students' attitudes towards organ dona­tion. J Adv Nursing 2000;32:961.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Anonymous. An exploratory study examining the influence of religion on attitudes towards organ donation among the Asian Population in Luton, UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;3: 1949-54.  Back to cited text no. 13      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Usha Bapat
Department of Nephrology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560034
India
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 20061720

Get Permissions



    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Deceased-donor organ transplantation: Knowledge and attitudes among health care professionals managing critically ill patients in Karachi
Siddiqui, O.T. and Nizami, S. and Raza, E. and Ali, M.U. and Bikak, M. and Siddiqui, S. and Khan, S.H. and Mustafa, M.A. and Khan, S. and Fatmi, Z.
Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 2012; 10(6): 544-550
[Pubmed]
2 Body donation in India: Social awareness, willingness, and associated factors
Rokade, S.A. and Gaikawad, A.P.
Anatomical Sciences Education. 2012; 5(2): 83-89
[Pubmed]
3 Attitudes towards transplantation and organ donation in high school graduates of math gymnasium in Osijek [Stavovi o transplantaciji i doniranju organa u maturanata Osječke matematičke gimnazije]
Lada, Z. and Zvonimir, P. and Nikola, R.L. and Vlasta, O.K.
Acta Medica Croatica. 2011; 65(SUPP 3): 63-66
[Pubmed]
4 Improving the rates of cadaver organ donation in a tertiary care transplant centre: A role for medical students and ancillary staff
Patwardhan, S.S. and Kulkarni, G.V.
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 2011; 57(4): 347-349
[Pubmed]
5 Knowledge, attitudes and proposals of medical students concerning transplantations in Greece
Dardavessis, T. and Xenophontos, P. and Haidich, A.-B. and Kiritsi, M. and Vayionas, M.A.
International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011; 2(3): 164-169
[Pubmed]
6 Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of officials of religion about organ donation in Kahramanmaras, an Eastern Mediterranean City of Turkey
Ozer, A. and Ekerbicer, H.C. and Celik, M. and Nacar, M.
Transplantation Proceedings. 2010; 42(9): 3363-3367
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Objectives
    Material and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Acknowledgement
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5835    
    Printed89    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded918    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal