Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 954 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 274-280
The clinical factors' prediction of increased intradialytic qt dispersion on the electrocardiograms of chronic hemodialysis patients


1 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
4 Division of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Dina Oktavia
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.109571

PMID: 23538349

Rights and Permissions

Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death are common in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The increase in QT dispersion (QTd) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects increased tendency for ventricular repolarization that predisposes to arrhythmias. The purpose of the study was to identify the clinical factors that may predict the increased intradialytic QTd and to assess differences in QTd before and after HD. Each of 61 chronic HD patients underwent 12-lead ECG and blood pressure (BP) measurement before and every 1 h during a single HD session. The QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula. Intradialytic QTd increased in 30 (49%) patients. There was no correlation between the increased QTd and the clinical factors including hypertension, pulse pressure, intradialytic hypotension, left ventricular hypertrophy, old myocardial infarct, diabetes mellitus, and nutritional status. The means of QT interval and QTd increased after HD session (from 382 ± 29 to 444 ± 26 ms, P <0.05; and from 74 ± 21 to 114 ± 53 ms, respectively, P <0.05). We conclude that the increased intradialytic QTd could not be predicted by any of the clinical factors evaluated in this study. There was significant difference in the means of QTd before and after HD session.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article  Email this article
    

  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Citation Manager
  Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1804    
    Printed46    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded417    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal