Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 592 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 12-18
Stress and burnout among hemodialysis nurses: A single-center, prospective survey study


Kanoo Kidney Center, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication8-Jan-2015
 

   Abstract 

Stress is a well known and identified problem within the nursing profession. Dialysis nurses are exposed to high level of stress. Increasing workload can aggravate stress and cause burnout and exhaustion. Stress and burnout are capable of having a detrimental impact on organizational productivity and pose serious health and safety hazards on the job. We aimed in this study to determine the type and level of stress and the amount of burnout among our dialysis nurses, and to evaluate the managing skills and the impact of stress on their work performance. There were 93 nurses (19 national and 74 expatriate nurses) who answered modified questionnaires to the aims of our prospective and descriptive correlational study. Our results show that most nurses involved in the study (national and expatriate) experienced a mild level of stress (79% and 68%, respectively) and moderate level of burnout (42% and 38%, respectively). The most common stressor among the national nurses was technical breakdowns of machines (15.9%) and that among expatriates was job insecurity (16.9%). The majority of the national nurses (21%) coped with this by increased sick leaves, whereas the majority (25%) of the expatriates responded by becoming easily frustrated. The most utilized coping skill among both groups was the relaxation methods (20.8% versus 24.9%) and the least utilized was denial (3.9% versus 0.5%). In conclusion, our results suggest the exposure of dialysis nurses to different types of stress and demonstrate the different experienced coping skills. These results may have implications for nursing management and hospital administration.

How to cite this article:
Karkar A, Dammang ML, Bouhaha BM. Stress and burnout among hemodialysis nurses: A single-center, prospective survey study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2015;26:12-8

How to cite this URL:
Karkar A, Dammang ML, Bouhaha BM. Stress and burnout among hemodialysis nurses: A single-center, prospective survey study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 16];26:12-8. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2015/26/1/12/148712

   Introduction Top


Stress is a well known and identified problem within the nursing profession, and is related to the intense work environment and the nature of the profession.[1],[2],[3] Nursing staff are usually exposed to different types of stress, which include increasing demands of care for excess number of patients, sicker and older patients, work overload with extra responsibilities and shortage of staff, timing and duration of working hours, personality conflict and fear of losing the job. [4],[5] Long-term exposure to occupational stress may not only physically and mentally exhaust nursing staff but can also lead to burnout [6],[7],[8],[9],[10] and varying degrees of depression. [11] Furthermore, there is an inverse relationship between stress and job satisfaction, [12] where excess and continuous exposure to stress may lead nurses to leave the profession and consequently may contribute to shortage of nursing staff. [13] Finally, stress and burnout may have a negative impact on the organizational productivity and may pose serious health and safety hazards at the work-place. [14],[15],[16]

Hemodialysis (HD) nurses are also exposed to stress and burnout, [17] but are prone to additional and more specific types of stress. These include intense activities during initiation and termination of dialysis sessions, urgent interventions when life-threatening complications arise and sudden confrontation with patients who may become verbally and/or physically abusive. [17],[18],[19] Furthermore, HD nurses have to deal with complex dialysis techniques, sophisticated modern HD machines, strict implementation of infection control policies and procedures, increased work demands due to the growing number of patients with end-stage renal disease in need of dialysis treatment, continuous shortage of professional dialysis nursing staff and chronic relationships with patients and their families, [20],[21],[22] all of which can be a major source of stress and burnout. [12]

Different studies have been conducted on stress and burnout among nurses in the general profession, but fewer were conducted among dialysis nurses. [23],[24],[25]

We aimed in this study to determine the type and level of stress among the HD nurses, the amount of burnout, the impact of stress on their work performance and the coping skills that were utilized to overcome the stressors.


   Methods Top


The Nursing Theorist Callista Roy's Adaptation Model was used to guide this research study. [26] This is based on its explicit assumption that a person is a bio-psycho-social being and that a person is in constant interaction and adaptation with a changing environment. The study was conducted using modified stress and burnout questionnaires, [27],[28],[29],[30],[31] which were answered by the participants who were working in the day and night shifts.

A descriptive correlational design of the questionnaires was used to determine whether there was a relationship between stress and burnout. For the stress scale, we listed 20 work-related stress causing factors wherein the participants were asked to rate their level of stress on each one from 0 to 5, where "0" meant rarely or never stressed and "5" reflected great deal of stress. For the burnout scale, a total of 25 questions, which provided an insight into the participants' susceptibility to burnout, were asked. The scale that was used indicated that 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often and 5 = always. The negative effects of burn-out were evaluated by listing six outcome conditions and the participants were asked to encircle all those applicable. There were nine coping skills listed, and the participants were asked to encircle all those applicable.

Among 200 of our dialysis nurses who were approached to be included in this research, 93 female dialysis nurses participated in this prospective study. There were 20% nationals and 80% expatriate nurses, who included Filipinos, Indians, Indonesians and Pakistanis. Their years of employment and practice varied between 1 and 26 years in the same HD unit. The purpose of the study was indicated in the questionnaire and the respondents were guaranteed confidentiality; they were not asked to write their names to protect their identity.


   Statistical Analysis Top


Results were analyzed by percentage and scoring. Data were treated with frequency distribution and percentages as shown in [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3] and [Table 4]. Pearson's product-moment correlation was applied to test the correlation between stress and burnout. [32]
Table 1: Grouped frequency distribution of the levels of stress among the national HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view
Table 2: Grouped frequency distribution of the levels of burnout among the national HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view
Table 3: Grouped frequency distribution of the levels of stress among the expatriate HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view
Table 4: Grouped frequency distribution of the levels of burnout among the expatriate HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view



   Results Top


Among the 19 national dialysis nurses who participated in the study, 79% had a mild level of stress, 16% showed moderate level and only 5% did not experience stress in the workplace [Table 1]. In addition, 42% of the national nurses showed a moderate level of burnout, 32% showed a high level of burnout and 26% showed a low level of burnout [Table 2]. Among the 74 expatriate dialysis nurses who participated in the study, 68% showed a mild level of stress, 17% showed no stress, 14% showed a moderate level of stress and 1% showed severe stress in the workplace [Table 3]. In addition, 38% showed a moderate level of burnout, 36% showed a low level of burn-out, 21% showed no burnout and 5% showed a high level of burnout [Table 4].

The most common cause of stress among the national nurses was defective machines (technical breakdown), which accounted for 15.9%, followed by exposure to needle stick injury (14.6%), demanding and manipulative patients (11%), having to work for long hours (11%) and less job compensation (11%). In comparison, the most common cause of stress among the expatriate nurses was job insecurity (16.9%), followed by demanding and manipulative patients (11.1%) and defective machines (10%) [Table 5]. There was no correlation between stress/burnout and duration of employment.
Table 5: Top ten stress-causing factors among the national and the expatriate HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view


The national and expatriate nurses reacted differently in responding to stress. The majority of national nurses (21%) increased their absence from work place by reporting sick leaves, followed by easy frustration (17.9%), decreased ability to work with colleagues, supervisors and physicians (17.9%), increased errors in decision making and/or performing role task (17.7%) and decreased patient care (16.1%). In comparison, the majority of the expatriate nurses responded by becoming easily frustrated (25%), followed by decreased ability to work with colleagues, supervisors and physicians (21%), increased errors in decision making and/or performing role task (17.7%) and decreased patient care (15.3%) [Table 6]. Coping with stress was similar among the national and the expatriate nurses. The most commonly used method was relaxation methods, which was used by 20.8% of the national nurses and 24.9% of the expatriate nurses. This was followed by dealing with the problem (18.2% and 24.3%) and learning new skills to deal with the problem (15.6% and 22.2%, respectively) [Table 7].
Table 6: Outcome of stress among the national and the expatriate HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view
Table 7: Stress reducing skills utilized by the national and the expatriate HD nurses in our study.

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


General nursing is a profession that requires working in a variety of timings and situations with continuous and regular delivery of physical and emotional care. [33] It is also a situation where the nursing staff can be under continuous exposure to a wide range of occupational stressors. French et al [34] identified conflict with physicians, problems with peers and supervisors, workload, uncertainty concerning treatment, dealing with death and dying patients and dealing with patients and their families as being potential stressors for nurses in general practice. Nurses who work in HD units have to deal with chronic HD patients who can become verbally or physically abusive, or both. [35] Over half of the nurses in a study conducted by Perrin [36] encountered some forms of violence in their nephrology unit. This is because dialysis patients can become frustrated in many areas, which could possibly lead them to become potentially violent or aggressive. [37] These areas include having renal failure, delays in treatment, arriving late for dialysis, waiting for nurses or machines, machine faults, not being seen often enough by a regular physician, feeling that no one is really listening to them, lack of information and lack of control, all of which can expose HD nurses to continuous stress. Ross et al [37] have also shown a positive association between increased stress and burn-out among dialysis nurses and some other factors such as age and years of experience.

Our results showed that a significant percentage of our national and expatriate dialysis nurses experienced mild level of stress with an outcome of moderate level of burnout. These results are similar to earlier reported studies. [24],[25] Correlation of our nurses' level of stress and burnout yielded a moderate correlation (r = 0.62) in the national nurses and a high positive correlation (r = 0.84) in the expatriate nurses. Our findings confirm that nurses working anywhere and of different backgrounds are confronted by stress that may lead to burnout, and that dialysis nurses are not immune to stress and its impact.

A high rate of stress and/or continuous exposure to stress can not only affect the individual nurse but also the healthcare field. [38] The exposure of our nursing staff to the different types of stressors resulted in negative outcomes such as frustration, decreased ability to work with colleagues, supervisors and physicians, increased errors in decision making and performing role task, decreased patient care and aggressive behavior toward staff and patients. Other studies had similar findings. [38],[39]

Therefore, it is important that nurses recognize the problem, confront stressors and learn to change the environment to reduce stressful situations in a productive and positive way. [40] It has been shown that the most common way nurses adapt to stressors is through the use of effective coping mechanisms. [41] The use of effective coping skills could also be very helpful to dialysis nurses to be able to manage job related stress. [42] Interestingly, both the national and the expatriate nurses in our study adapted similar skills to combat stress such as the relaxation methods. Rosenthal [43] recommended the elimination of stress by means of relaxation and desensitization techniques and biofeedback. Earlier studies [44],[45] suggested the use of relaxation techniques along with a regimen for proper sleep, exercise, nutrition, meditation and socializing with family and friends. [41] The other coping skills used by the nurses in our study included dealing or learning new skills to deal with the problem, seeing humor in a situation and managing hostile feeling, whereas denial was the least-utilized coping skill.

Our study has implications for the nursing and hospital administration and education personnel, [46] such as assessing the structural and managerial aspects of nursing, properly addressing nurse's stress and burnout in order to prevent major crises and providing continuous support and effective guidelines to enable the nursing staff to deal with abusive patients in the dialysis unit as well as possible abuses by nurse managers. [47],[48] These findings may also further support the development of a working group from both management and nursing staff to explore issues such as shift patterns and the time constraints. [49] In addition, theoretical education, practical training, continuous orientation program for new staff nurses and clinical supervision with proper protocols and guidelines that assess individual performance are necessary to ensure achievement of adequate skills and knowledge to independently manage patients on dialysis. [50],[51],[52],[53]

In conclusion, our results suggest the exposure of dialysis nurses to different types of stress and demonstrate the different experienced coping skills. These results may have implications for nursing management and hospital administration.

 
   References Top

1.
Lee V, Henderson MC. Occupational stress and organizational commitment in nurse administrators. J Nurs Adm 1996;26:21-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Seago JA, Faucett J. Job strain among registered nurses and other hospital workers. J Nurs Adm 1997;27:19-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bryant C, Fairbrother G, Fenton P. The relative influence of personal and workplace descriptors on stress. Br J Nurs 2000;9:876-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Muncer S, Taylor S, Green DW, McManus IC. Nurses′ representations of the perceived causes of work-related stress: A network drawing approach. Work Stress 2001;15:40-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hall DS. Work-related stress of registered nurses in a hospital setting. J Nurs Staff Dev 2004;20:6-14.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rowe MM. Hardiness, stress, temperament, coping, and burnout in health professionals. Am J Health Behav 1997;21:163-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bussing A, Glaser J. Four-stage process model of the core factors of burnout: The role of work stressors and work-related stressor. Work Stress 2000;14:329-46.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
McManus IC, Winder BC, Gordon D. The causal links between stress and burnout in a longitudinal study of UK doctors. Lancet 2002;359:2089-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Patrick K, Lavery JF. Burnout in nursing. Australian J Adv Nurs 2007;24:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Di Iorio B, Cucciniello E, Bellizzi V. Differences in burnout between northern and southern Italian dialysis health-care providers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:775-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Ruggiero JS. Health, work, variables and job satisfaction among nurses. J Nurs Adm 2003;35:254-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hayes B., Bonnet A. Job satisfaction, stress and burnout associated with hemodialysis nursing: A review of literature. J Ren Care 2010;36:174-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kapucu SS, Akkuş Y, Akdemir N, Karacan Y. The burnout and exhaustion levels of nurses working in haemodialysis units. J Ren Care 2009;35:134-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Goliszek AG. Breaking the stress habit: A modern guide to one minute stress management. Winston-Salem: Carolina, 1988. p. 73.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Fletcher CE. Hospital RNs′ job satisfactions and dissatisfactions. J Nurs Adm 2001;31:324-31.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sandovich JM. Work excitement in nursing: an examination of the relationship between work excitement and burnout. Nurs Econ J 2005;23:91-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Argentero P, Dell′Oliv B, Ferretti MS. Staff burnout and patient satisfaction with the quality of dialysis care. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;51:80-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Vahey DC, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Clarke SP, Vargas D. Nurse burnout and patient satisfaction. Med Care 2004;42 Suppl 2:57-66.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Karkar A. The value of pre-dialysis care. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2011;22:419-27.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
20.
Brokalaki H, Matziou V, Thanou J, Zirogiannis P, Dafni U, Papadatou D. Job-related stress among nursing personnel in Greek dialysis. EDTNA ERCA J 2001;27:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kotzabassaki S, Parisssopoulos S. Burnout in Renal care professionals. EDTNA-ERCA J 2003;29:209-13.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Rivares AV, Navarrete IG, Pueyo CG, et al. Evaluation of relationships between haemodialysis unit professionals. EDTNA-ERCA J 2004;30:27-30.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lambert VA, Lambert CE. Literature review of role of stress/strain on nurses: An international perspective. Nurs Health Sci 2001;3:161-75.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Arikan F, Köksal CD, GökçeC. Work-related stress, burnout, and job satisfaction of dialysis nurses in association with perceived relations with professional contacts. Dial Transplant 2007;36:182-91.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Böhmert M, Kuhnert S, Nienhaus A. Psychological stress and strain in dialysis staff - A systemic review. J Ren Care 2011;37:178-89.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Andrew HA. The Roy adaptation model. The definitive statement. Norwalk: CT Appleton and Lange; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Heavey E. Statistics for Nursing: A Practical Approach. USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Phillips S. Labouring the emotions: Expanding the remit of nursing work. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:139-43.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
French SE, Lenton R, Walters V, Eyels J. An empirical evaluation of an expanded nursing stress scale. J Nurs Meas 2000;8:161-78.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Rowe MM, Sherlock H. Stress and verbal abuse in nursing: Do burned out nurses eat their young? J Nurs Manag 2005;13:242-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Perrin S. Managing violence and aggression on renal unit. EDTNA-ERCA J 1997;23:34-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Ross J, Jones J, Callaghan P, Eales S. A survey of stress, job satisfaction and burnout among haemodialysis staff. J Ren Care 2009;35:127-33.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Garrick R, Kliger A, Stefanchik B. Patient and facility safety in hemodialysis: Opportunities and strategies to develop a culture of safety. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7:680-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Nayeri ND, Negarandeh R, Vaismoradi M, Ahmadi F, Faghihzadeh S. Burnout and productivity among Iranian nurses. Nurs Health Sci 2009;11:263-70.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
McGowan B. Self-reported stress and its effects on nurses. Nurs Stand 2006;15:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Gates DM. Stress and coping: A model for the workplace. AAOHN J 2001;49:390-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Watson R, Deary I, Thompson D, Li G. A study of stress and burnout in nursing students in Hong Kong: A questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:1534-42.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Linberg RE. Creatively coping with job stress. Assoc Manag 1990;42:80-2.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Yung PM, Fung IM, Chan TM, Lau BW. Relaxation training methods for nurse managers in Hong Kong: A controlled study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2004;13:255-61.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Khanna A, Paul M, Sandhu JS. Efficacy of two relaxation techniques in reducing pulse rate among highly stressed females. Calicut Med J 2007;5:e2.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Burke RJ. Hospital restructuring stressors: Support and nursing staff perceptions of unit functioning. Health Care Manag 2003;22:241-8.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Laschinger HK, Wong C, McMahon L, Kaufmann C. Leader behavior impact on staff nurse empowerment, job tension, and work effectiveness. J Nurs Adm 1999;29:28-39.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Laschinger HK, Almost J, Purdy N, Kim J. Predictors of nurse managers′ health in Canadian restructured health settings. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) 2004;17:88-105.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Jezuit DL. The manager′s role during nurse suffering: Creating an environment of support and compassion. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul 2002;4:26-9.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Revis KS, Thompson C, Williams M, Bezanson J, Cook KL. Nursing orientation: A continuous quality improvement story. Clin Nurse Spec 1996;10:89-93.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Lavoie-Tremblay M, Viens C, Forcier M, et al. How to facilitate the orientation of new nurses into the workplace. J Nurses Staff Dev 2002;18:80-5.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Ewers P, Bradshaw T, McGovern J, Ewers B. Does training in psychosocial interventions reduce burnout rate in forensic nurses? J Adv Nurs 2002;37:470-6.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Rodham K, Bell J. Work stress: An exploratory study on the practices and perceptions of female junior healthcare managers. J Nurs Manag 2002;10:5-11.  Back to cited text no. 53
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
PhD, FRCP, FASN Ayman Karkar
Kanoo Kidney Center, Dammam Medical Complex, P. O. Box 11825, Dammam 31463
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.148712

PMID: 25579710

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
   
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Statistical Analysis
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7224    
    Printed91    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1336    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal