Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 1583 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
 

Table of Contents   
RENAL DATA FROM ASIA–AFRICA  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 599-608
Gender differences in perceptions and attitudes of general population towards organ donation: An Indian perspective


1 College of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (Institute of National Importance), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
3 Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (Institute of National Importance), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication18-May-2017
 

   Abstract 

Globally, shortage of organs available for organ transplantation is a major problem. Studies assessing awareness and attitudes towards organ donation are limited from India. The aim of this study is to assess gender differences in the perceptions and attitude of general population toward organ donation. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among randomly selected patient relatives (n = 193) at the outpatient department of a tertiary care center. Data were collected through face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire. Our findings revealed that majority of men than women were aware and in favor of promoting organ donation (χ2 = 10.428, P < 0.001). Best part of men (70.9%) compared to 52.3% of women were willing to donate their organs after death (χ2 = 18.080, P <0.001). Similarly, more number of (48.5%) men were willing to sign on the organ donation card. There is an urgent need to uncover the myths and misconceptions of the general population toward organ donation. Further, healthcare providers and governmental and nongovernmental agencies should take active initiation in motivating the public to give their consent for organ donation.

How to cite this article:
Poreddi V, Sunitha T S, Thimmaiah R, Math SB. Gender differences in perceptions and attitudes of general population towards organ donation: An Indian perspective. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2017;28:599-608

How to cite this URL:
Poreddi V, Sunitha T S, Thimmaiah R, Math SB. Gender differences in perceptions and attitudes of general population towards organ donation: An Indian perspective. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 12];28:599-608. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2017/28/3/599/206460

   Introduction Top


The shortage of organs available for organ transplantation is a global concern.[1] Organ donation is defined as an act of giving one or more organs, without compensation, for transplantation to another person.[2] India is one of the lowest organ donating countries in the world. In India, “The transplantation of Human Organs Act” was legalized in 1994,[3] yet organ donation rate in India is very poor (0.16/ million) compared to developed countries (35/million in Spain).[4]

Public awareness of organ donation primarily affects the organ transplantation programs.[5] Previous research showed that knowledge and perceptions about organ donation were positively associated with donation attitudes, willingness, and donor registration.[6],[7],[8] However, numerous studies have shown positive attitude among general population toward organ donation and transplantation.[9],[10] Further, a recent review literature based on 33 studies confirmed that young age, women, high socio economic status, education, knowledge and awareness of organ donation, experiential knowledge about organ donation, and family positive attitudes were found to be the most influencing factors for organ donation.[11]

In general, organs’ donors come from brain dead and nonheart-beating donors.[12] Brain death was explained as definite death of the brain despite other live organs without any hope for improvement and the impending change into complete death (death of the brain and other organs) within few hours, days, or months.[13] According to a nongovernmental organization, in India, there were 1.4 lakhs accident victims diagnosed as brain dead annually. Yet, organs from only about 120 were retrieved. This shows the magnitude of organ shortage problem in India despite having adequate organs available. Hence, it is crucial to assess general population attitudes toward organ donation. In India, there is a dearth of information available on this topic. In India, only a few studies had been conducted on this topic among health-care workers,[14] patients,[15] college students,[16] and public[17] and rural population.[18] However, studies that focused gender differences in their attitudes toward organ donation were not found. Thus, the present study was aimed to assess gender differences in perceptions and attitude of general population toward organ donation.


   Materials and Methods Top


This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey carried out among the relatives of the patients attending the outpatient department (OPD) at a tertiary care center in Bangalore, South India.

The study sample was selected through random sampling technique (lottery method) based on the OPD registry. The study criteria included individuals aged 18 years and above and those were willing to participate. Persons with cognitive impairment and relatives of the patients those were waiting for organ transplants were excluded from the study. Overall 275 individuals were approached to participate in our study, 82 (30%) declined to participate due to lack of interest and time. Hence, our final sample comprised 193 participants with 70% response rate.

Data collection instruments

The questionnaire included three sections.

  1. Section A: this part consisted of items about sociodemographic details of the participants such as age, gender, education, religion, economic status, marital status, and residence. In addition, five questions regarding participants’ awareness about organ donation, brain death, legislation, opinion on promotion of organ donation, and sources of information about organ donation were inquired
  2. Section B: this part consisted of 22 items with a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” to assess perceptions and attitudes of participants toward organ donation.[19] Points ranging from 1 to 5 were given to each response such that the more positive the response, the higher the score. The total possible scores for this scale range from 22 to 110
  3. Section C: this part of the questionnaire measured participants’ willingness to donate the organs. Intent to sign the card was measured on a 5-point scale developed by Skumanich and Kintsfather[20] (1 = “I will definitely sign the card,” 2 = “I will probably sign the card,” 3 = “I am unsure as to whether or not I will sign it,” 4 = “I will probably not sign it,” and 5 = “I will definitely not sign it.”). A sixth item was added to identify the participants who had already signed an organ donation card.[21]


Data collection procedure

The questionnaire was piloted among group (n = 20) of participants and found the study was feasible. Necessary modifications were made. The primary author through face-to-face interview collected the data, in a private room at the treatment facilities where the participants were recruited. It took approximately 45 min to complete the structured questionnaire.

Ethical consideration

The Ethics Committee of the concerned hospital approved the study protocol. The researchers approached the participants and explained briefly about purposes of the present study. Written consent was obtained from the volunteered participants and they were given freedom to quit the study. Participants’ confidentiality was respected.


   Statistical Analysis Top


Before analysis, negatively worded items were reverse coded. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical software. Descriptive and inferential statistics used to determine significant differences between the participants regarding their mean knowledge and attitudes’ scores. Statistical significance considered at P <0.05.


   Results Top


The present study sample consisted of 193 participants, of whom 53% were men. The mean age for the men was 43.21 ± 15.56 [M ± standard deviation (SD)] and for the women was 45.18 ± 15.47 (m ± SD). The number of women who were illiterate (26.7%) was little higher than men (17.5%). Majority of the participants were Hindus and were married. More number of men (99%) were aware and approved to promote organ donation than women (χ2 = 10.428, P <0.001) [Table 1]. More number of men than women received information about organ donation through television (39.9%), followed by newspapers (19.6%) and friends (19.1%) [Figure 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of the respondents.

Click here to view
Figure 1: Sources of information about organ donation.

Click here to view


[Table 2] illustrates gender differences related to attitudes toward organ donation. Best part of men (70.9%) comparing to 52.3% of women were willing to donate their organs after death (χ2 = 18.080, P<0.001). Although the majority of the participants from both groups felt that it is important to discuss with family about their “after death” wishes, 17.5% of men were unsure about it (χ2 = 19.383, P <0.001). However, 85.4% of men discussed their “after death” wishes with their families (χ = 10.502, P <0.03). Similarly, majority of men (92.3% and 77.8%) than women agreed to receive (χ = 9.520, P <0.04) and donate (χ2 = 9.941, P <0.04) to a person of a different race. While 46.6% of men were unsure, 60% of women approved that organ donation is a safe and effective practice (χ2 = 12.076, P <0.01). A majority of men (56.3% and 58.3%) opined that it was important for a person’s body to have all its parts when buried (χ = 7.688, P <0.05) and impossible to have a regular funeral service after organ donation (χ = 17.594, P<0.001). Despite the fact that 17.8% of women disapproved, majority (76.7%) of men agreed that organs for transplant can be bought and sold on the black market in India (χ2 = 12.253, P <0.01). Majority of women (60%) than men opined that poor persons also have an equal opportunity for organ transplantation (χ2= 11.756, P <0.01). Further, a significant association was found between men and women whether they were willing to sign on the organ donation card or not (χ2 = 6.885, P <0.03). Whereas 66.7% of women were unsure, 48.5% of men were willing to sign on the organ donation card [Table 3].
Table 2: Gender differences of the participants toward organ donation attitude questionnaire.

Click here to view
Table 3: Participants' intentions to sign the organ donation card.

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


This was the first innovative study that examined gender differences related to their attitudes toward organ donation from India. The present study was unique in nature as it was conducted among general population who attended OPD at a tertiary care center. Hence, we were able to collect the representative sample from various backgrounds. Our study also demonstrated positive attitudes toward organ donation among men compared to women.

In the current study, more of men were familiar about organ donation and were in favor of promoting organ donation than women. These findings could be because literacy rate among men than women is higher in India. Hence, men may follow newspapers and television more often than women. The present study also demonstrated that majority (59%) of men and (44.5%) women received information about organ donation through television and newspapers. These findings reflect the findings of the previous research.[22] Similar to a recent study, more number of men than women were willing to donate their organs after death. On the contrary, other studies have shown that women have more willingness to donate organs.[23],[24],[25],[26]

In India, family plays a crucial role in organ donation process. Thus, it is important to discuss with family members regarding donation of organs after the death of the potential organ donor. Majority of women in this study disagreed to discuss their wishes related organ donation while 85.4% of men discussed their wishes about organ donation with their families. These findings were contradictory to a recent national survey that found 81% of women than men (68.3%) discussed their wishes to be a donor with family members.[27] Same way, in a study from Ireland, observed that 67% of women have discussed organ donation with their family at some point in their lives, whereas only 41% of men felt the issue important enough to speak about with their families. This could lead us to think that discussing the topic and having the right information about it makes a person more prone to make a decision about organ dona- tion.[28] Earlier studies also indicate that persons those discussed organ donation with family members may be more willing to donate organs.[29],[30] Further, family’s knowledge of the individual wish about organ donation influence on decision-making by family to provide consent for organ donation.[31] In a recent study from Australia, majority of donors opined that organ donation would not create distress, and family supported the idea of organ donation would respect their wishes if they were recorded on the register. Hence, organ donation needs to be considered as a family decision.[32] Thus, it is important to encourage people to discuss organ donation with their family members. Men in the present study were more willing to donate and receive organs from a different race than women. These findings indicate positive attitudes among men participants.

Review literature clearly indicates that stigma and cultural beliefs such as the importance of being buried intact were the common barriers to organ donation.[33],[34] Although majority of men were in favor of organ donation, they also believed that it is important for a person to have all parts when buried and it is impossible to have regular funeral services after organ donation. These findings were comparable to a study that found more often men refused to donate as postmortem donors than do women.[24] In a study, it was found that men were more concerned with maintaining their bodies’ integrity to maintain personal dignity and believed that body desecration will bring bad luck.[35] Further, a study found that fear of a lack of body wholeness strongly influences peoples’ beliefs toward organ donation.[36] In addition, studies also provided evidence that participants felt that organ donation creates inconvenience to burial arrangements.[37]

Recently, organ trade has become an important issue that should be tackled with an appropriate legislation.[38] According to the Health Organization, it was estimated that organ trafficking may be accounting for up to 5%- 10% of the kidney transplants performed annually.[39] More number of men opined that organs for transplant can be bought and sold on the black market in India. In fact, it was true that before the commencement of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act in 1994, India had a successful legal market in organ trading. Low cost and availability brought in business from around the globe and transformed India into one of the largest kidney transplant centers in the world.[40] Nonetheless, ethical issues in organ trade pushed the Indian government to pass legislation banning the sale of organs.[41] However, illegal organ donation and misuse of organs was a main reason for low for organ donation rate in India.[3]

In line with previous research, our study also observed that men were more willing to sign on organ donation card than women. These findings were in parallel with a study from Libya that demonstrated significantly stronger willingness among men than women.[25] On the contrary, in few studies, it was found that females were more willing to donate organs.[24],[42] [44] Although majority of the participants in the present study were in favor of organ donation, only 0.5% had organ donation card. However, majority of the participants from both groups were unsure about signing in organ donation cards. Hence, public education campaigns should focus on motivating public to sign on organ donation cards.


   Limitations Top


There were certain limitations in the present study such as cross-sectional design; small sample restricted to one tertiary care center that made difficult to generalize the findings. Therefore, future studies that include a larger sample and qualitative studies with focus on group discussions may be helpful to understand this issue in-depth. However, the strength of the present study is that it include a random sample at a tertiary care center that comprises of participants with various backgrounds and represents the varied Indian population. The findings of the present study may be helpful in planning the public education programs.


   Conclusion Top


The present study was successful in demonstrating gender differences in their attitudes toward organ donation. Men found to be hold more positive attitudes toward organ donation than women. However, cultural beliefs such as body integrity while burying and it is not possible to have regular funeral service after organ donation were still exist among majority of the participants. Hence, there is an urgent need to uncover the myths and misconceptions of the general population toward organ donation. However, these points to be taken into consideration while planning public awareness programs about organ donation. Further, health-care providers and governmental and non-governmental agencies should take active initiation in motivating the public to give their consent for organ donation.


   Acknowledgments Top


We thank all the participants for their valuable contribution.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

 
   References Top

1.
Andrei H. Psychosocial determinants of organ donation intentions and their relevance for public campaigns. Postmodern Openings 2013; 4:9-27.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gruessner R. Organ Donation; 2013. Available from: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/ topic/431886/organ-donation. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 15 2014].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shroff S. Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation and transplantation. Indian J Urol 2009;25:348-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Srinivasan. India’s Rate of Organ Donation Compares Poorly with Other Countries’. Times of India; 3rd August, 2013. Available from: http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/edit- page/Indias-rate-of-organ-donation-compares- poorly-with-other-countries/articleshow/ 21559260.cms. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 15].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Afshar R, Sanavi S, Rajabi MR. Attitude and willingness of high school students toward organ donation. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012;23:929-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Falomir-Pichastor JM, Berent JA, Pereira A. Social psychological factors of post-mortem organ donation: A theoretical review of determinants and promotion strategies. Health Psychol Rev 2013;7:202-47.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, et al. Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:2526-33.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Rithalia A, McDaid C, Suekarran S, Myers L, Sowden A. Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: A systematic review. BMJ 2009;338:a3162.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Rey JW, Grass V, Barreiros AP, et al. Organ procurement in Germany: A regional survey among students. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2012; 137:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cucchetti A, Zanello M, Bigonzi E, et al. The use of social networking to explore knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation in Italy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:1109-16.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Wakefield CE, Watts KJ, Homewood J, Meiser B, Siminoff LA. Attitudes toward organ donation and donor behavior: A review of the international literature. Prog Transplant 2010; 20:380-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Sanford J. When are you dead? Resurgent form of organ transplantation raises a new question. Stanford Med 2011;28:29.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Shahbazian H, Dibaei A, Barfi M. Public attitudes toward cadaveric organ donation: A survey in Ahwaz. Urol J 2006;3:234-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Ahlawat R, Kumar V, Gupta AK, Sharma RK, Minz M, Jha V. Attitude and knowledge of healthcare workers in critical areas towards deceased organ donation in a public sector hospital in India. Natl Med J India 2013;26: 322-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Mithra P, Ravindra P, Unnikrishnan B, et al. Perceptions and attitudes towards organ donation among people seeking healthcare in tertiary care centers of coastal South India. Indian J Palliat Care 2013;19:83-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Annadurai K, Mani K, Ramasamy J. A study on knowledge, attitude and practices about organ donation among college students in Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 2012. Prog Health Sci 2013;3:59-65.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Josephine G, Little Flower R, Balamurugan E. A study on public intention to donate organ: Perceived barriers and facilitators. Br J Med Practioners 2013;6:a636.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Manojan KK, Raja RA, Nelson V, Beevi N, Jose R. Knowledge and attitude towards organ donation in rural kerala. Acad J India 2014; 2:25-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jacob Arriola KR, Robinson DH, Perryman JP, Thompson N. Understanding the relationship between knowledge and African Americans’ donation decision-making. Patient Educ Couns 2008;70:242-50.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Skumanich SA, Kintsfather DP. Promoting the organ donor card: A causal model of persuasion effects. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:401-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Cohen EL. My Loss is Your Gain: Examining the Role of Message Frame, Perceived Risk, and Ambivalence in the Decision to Become an Organ Donor. Communication Theses. Paper 26; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Georgiadou E, Sounidakis N, Mouloudi E, et al. Attitudes and behavior toward organ donation in Greece. Transplant Proc 2012;44: 2698-701.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Tanriverdi G, Bedir E, Sevig U. The effect of gender on health related attitudes and behaviors. TAF Prev Med Bull 2007;6:435-40.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Decker O, Winter M, Brahler E, Beutel M. Between comodification and altrusim: Gender imbalance and attitudes towards organ donation. A representative study of the German community. J Gend Stud 2008;17:251-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Alashek W, Ehtuish E, Elhabashi A, Emberish W, Mishra A. Reasons for unwillingness of libyans to donate organs after death. Libyan J Med 2009;4:110-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Gungormus Z, Dayapoglu N. The knowledge, attitude and behaviour of individuals regarding organ donations. TAF Prev Med Bull 2014;13: 133-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
HRSA. 2012 National Survey of Organ Donation Attitudes and Behaviors; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
McGill L. Attitudes Surrounding Organ Donation in Relation to Gender in Ireland; 2012. http://esource.dbs.ie/bitstream/handle/10788/3 4 2/ba_mcgill_l_2012.pdf?sequence=1 2012.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Murray L, Miller A, Dayoub C, Wakefield C, Homewood J. Communication and consent: Discussion and organ donation decisions for self and family. Transplant Proc 2013;45:10-2.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K, Brinberg D, Haes J. More than nation and knowledge: Cultural micro- diversity and organ donation in Switzerland. Patient Educ Couns 2006;64:294-302.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mossialos E, Costa-Font J, Rudisill C. Does organ donation legislation affect individuals’ willingness to donate their own or their relative’s organs? Evidence from European Union survey data. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:48.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Hyde MK, Kylie RW, Katherine MW. Do the Myths Still Exist? Revisiting People’s Negative Beliefs about Organ Donation upon Death; 2013. Available from: http://www98. griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/ 50449/82560_1.pdf?sequence=1. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 23].  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Noordin N, Zakaria Z, Aminuddin A, et al. Organ donation among Malaysian: The Malay Dilemma toward social development. Asian Soc Sci 2012;8:8-15.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Edwards TM, Essman C, Thornton JD. Assessing racial and ethnic differences in medical student knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding organ donation. J Natl Med Assoc 2007;99:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bresnahan M, Lee SY, Smith SW, Shearman S, Yoo JH. Reservations of the spirit: The development of a culturally sensitive spiritual beliefs scale about organ donation. Health Commun 2007;21:45-54.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, et al. Community attitudes to deceased organ donation: A focus group study. Transplantation 2012;93:1064-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lee E, Midodizi W, Gourishankar S. Attitudes and opinions on organ donation: An opportunity to educate in a Canadian city. Clin Transplant 2010;24:E223-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Saleem T, Ishaque S, Habib N, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices survey on organ donation among a selected adult population of Pakistan. BMC Med Ethics 2009;10:5.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Budiani-Saberi DA, Delmonico FL. Organ trafficking and transplant tourism: A commentary on the global realities. Am J Transplant 2008;8:925-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Handwerk B. Organ Shortage Fuels Illicit Trade in Human Parts; 2004. Available from: http://www.news.nationalgeographic.com/new s/2004/01/0116_040116_EXPLorgantraffic.ht ml. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 27].  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Jafarey A, Thomas G, Ahmad A, Srinivasan S. Asia’s organ farms. Indian J Med Ethics 2007;4:52-3.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Buitrago J, Gómez S, Guerra A, Lucumí L, Romero C, Sánchez J. Evaluation of an educational, theater-based intervention on attitudes toward organ donation in Risaralda, Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali) 2013;44:37-41.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Mossialos E, Costa-Font J, Rudisill C. Does organ donation legislation affect individuals’ willingness to donate their own or their relative’s organs? Evidence from European Union survey data. 2008;8:48. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472- 6963/8/48. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 14].  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Mocan N, Tekin E. The determinants of the willingness to donate an organ among young adults: evidence from the United States and the European Union. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:2527- 38.  Back to cited text no. 44
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Vijayalakshmi Poreddi
College of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (Institute of National Importance), Bengaluru - 560 029, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.206460

PMID: 28540899

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Statistical Analysis
   Results
   Discussion
   Limitations
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2208    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded300    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal