Home About us Current issue Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
Advanced search 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 1921 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 

CASE REPORT Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 719-722
Recurrence of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis post transplant – Is this mere recurrence of pattern or recurrence of disease?

1 Department of Nephrology, Institute of Nephro-Urology, Victoria Hospital Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Nephropathology, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Umesh Lingaraj
Department of Nephrology, Institute of Nephro-Urology, Victoria Hospital Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.261356

PMID: 31249240

Rights and Permissions

Recurrence of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is seen in 1965% cases of postrenal transplant resulting in graft loss in up to 35-50% of cases. A 31-year-old female, after 1% years on maintenance hemodialysis, underwent ABO compatible deceased donor kidney transplantation with basiliximab induction. During the immediate posttransplant period, the patient had delayed graft function, but achieved nadir creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL by 10 days. Nine months posttransplant, the patient developed fever, anasarca, and decrease in urine output with albuminuria 3+, active sediments in urine, serum creatinine 3.5 mg/dL, 24-h urine protein 7.5 g, and low C3. The patient underwent graft biopsy. Subsequently, the patient received pulse steroid for three days and five sessions of plasmapheresis. Renal biopsy report was suggestive of MPGN with focal crescents and acute tubular necrosis. Immunofluorescence showed Ig G3+, C3 3+, к 3+, and negative for λ or other immunoglobulins or complements. As her native kidney disease was immune-complex-mediated MPGN with no light chain restriction, paraffin tissue of the native kidney was reexamined for light chain restrictions by immunoperoxidase method, but did not show light chain restriction. The patient underwent extensive workup for paraproteinemias, but results were negative. Subsequently, she received four doses of bortezomib. The patient’s serum creatinine got reduced to 0.8 mg/dL and proteinuria reduced to 800 mg/day. Our case is unique as we were not able to demonstrate monoclonal deposits in native kidney sample although there was recurrence of MPGN with monoclonal light chain deposits post transplant. Our findings emphasize the need for thorough evaluation of paraproteinemias in patients with idiopathic MPGN even in the absence of light chain deposition in biopsy.

Print this article  Email this article

  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Citation Manager
  Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded143    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal