Year : 2009 | Volume
: 20 | Issue : 1 | Page : 30--34
Burden among care-givers of kidney transplant recipients and its associated factors
Behzad Einollahi1, Saeed Taheri2, Eghlim Nemati1, Shahin Abbaszadeh1, Vahid Pourfarziani1, Mohammad Hossein Nourbala1,
1 Nephrology and Urology Research Center (NURC), Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Dr Taheri Medical Research Group, Iranian Medical Point, Tehran, Iran
Nephrology and Urology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Mollasadra St, Vanak Square, Tehran
Burden among care-givers of chronically ill patients has been widely investigated. However, there is no study evaluating perceived pressure on care-givers of kidney transplant recipients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of care-giving to renal transplant recipients in Iranian Muslim population and to analyze factors associated with it. A cross-sectional study was carried out involving 41 care-givers of renal recipients. The Care-giver Burden Scale (CB Scale) was used to evaluate the care-giver«SQ»s perceived burden and its correlates. Statistical analysis was performed using software SPSS v.13.0. P < 0.05 was considered significant. We found that increased care-giver burden was related to being married (p< 0.02), having lower education level (p< 0.05), and being a parent or spouse to the patient (p< 0.05). We also found significant adverse effects of patients«SQ» second transplantation and gender (male) on care-givers«SQ» burden. There was no significant relationship between care-giver burden score and patients«SQ» marital status, education level, operation time, age, donor type (cadaveric or living), and dialysis history before and after transplantation. In conclusion, care-givers experience strain, which has implications for research and service provision. Service providers need to identify those care-givers at risk of greater strain and help them in situations that cannot be altered. Future research should be conducted to identify the effects of interventions, on care-givers«SQ» burden perception.
|How to cite this article:|
Einollahi B, Taheri S, Nemati E, Abbaszadeh S, Pourfarziani V, Nourbala MH. Burden among care-givers of kidney transplant recipients and its associated factors.Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2009;20:30-34
|How to cite this URL:|
Einollahi B, Taheri S, Nemati E, Abbaszadeh S, Pourfarziani V, Nourbala MH. Burden among care-givers of kidney transplant recipients and its associated factors. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2009 [cited 2021 Jan 21 ];20:30-34
Available from: https://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2009/20/1/30/44703
The physical and emotional status of family care-givers has the potential to influence the health, welfare and successful rehabilitation of persons with chronic illness. , Studies on hemodialysis patients have demonstrated that some of the characteristics of care-givers contribute to the subjective well-being of the patients themselves and affect their ability to cope with the problem. , For example, Christensen et al found that the family support received by a patient on dialysis was a significant predictor of his/her ability to cope with the disease and survival, which was three times less in patients reporting a low level of family support. 
In view of the extensive co-ordination associated with care-giving, including symptom management, disability, mobility, and dressings, it is perhaps not surprising that research has documented a variety of psychological sequelae among home-based givers of palliative care.  Additionally, patient circumstances can have strong impact on the amount of caregivers' burden. 
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects on care-givers of renal recipient patients and to recognize factors and burdens that may impact upon both the physical and psychological health of the care-giver.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of primary care-givers that attended the nephrology clinic at the Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Among 124 kidney transplant recipients, 94 had care-givers and 41 of these care-givers agreed to participate in the study.
The primary care-giver was defined as the main responsible and informed relative (or an otherwise close personal contact). The recognition of the care-giver was made with the patient's and the physician's acknowledgement.
In-person interviews were conducted to ascertain data on the care-givers' socio-demographic characteristics, self-reported health status, support systems, and amount of assistance they provided to their patient. Patients' sociodemographic characteristics were also obtained.
Care-giver burden was measured using a 20item subset of the Caregiver Burden (CB) Scale.  A Farsi translated version of the scale was used for this study.
There were 20 males (49%) and 21 females (51%). The mean age of the patients at the time of study was 40 ± 13.5 years (range: 13 to 73). Of the study subjects, 14 (34%) were employed, six (15%) were retired, four (10%) were students and 17 (41%) were unemployed; 32 (78%) were married; 37 (90%) were living in urban areas and 29 (72%) had an education level of high school or above.
The mean age of care-givers was 38 years (SD = 11.63) with a range of 17 - 68 years; there were 21 males and 22 females. Most of the care-givers were married (83.7%), living with their spouse and children (100%) and education level of high school and higher (70%).
Of the care-givers, 15 (36.5%) were spouses, 15 others (36.5%) were parents, seven (17%) were children and four (10%) were siblings. The average time the care-givers spent helping the transplant recipient was 10.5 ± 8.0 hours per day.
Activities of daily living
[Table 1] shows patient's dependence in activities of daily living and care-giver's contribution, as well as their perceived pressure. Mean percentage of patients who needed help in each of their daily living activities was 62%. Care-givers contributed in 90% (81-98%) of patient's dependent activities and reported perceived burden in 19 ± 6% of each of the contributing daily activities. Higher dependence rate of patients in daily activities was significantly associated with higher levels of perceived burden by the care-givers (p Patients' factors
There was no significant relationship between care-giver burden perception and patients' marital status, education level, operation time, age, donor type (cadaveric or living), being from urban or rural areas, and dialysis history before transplantation (p> 0.05). The cause of renal failure in the patient and dialysis history if any, after transplantation also was not related to care-giver's burden perception (p> 0.05). Care-givers of patients with previous history of allograft rejection reported significantly more burdens (p factors
For care-givers, being married (p= 0.01), having lower education level (p = Health care services
The patient dependence to the care-giver was significantly reduced by use of a trained nurse at home (p 
There are good reasons to study these groups. Most Medicaid beneficiaries who have disabilities rely on informal care-givers for most of their assistance with personal care, and society relies on unpaid care-givers to help beneficiaries live in the home or community as long as possible. The care-giver's motivation in taking responsibility and caring for another person may also have consequences for his/her own satisfaction, , and their ability and willingness to give care appears to be mediated by their ability to find gratification and meaning in their role as care-giver. 
This study is a first attempt to investigate perceived burden and its correlates in caregivers of kidney transplant patients. We found that care-givers of kidney transplant patients contribute greatly to their relative patients' daily activities. Moreover, most of them did not report a significant feeling of pressure in any of the activities helping their relative patients.
Care-givers are not receiving support or services that might sustain them in long-term care-giving roles. Systems are needed that identify protective and risk factors among care-givers and to provide appropriate continuing services in a proactive rather than crisisresponsive manner. In this study, we found that among different daily activities, staying with the patient and not leaving them alone, alongside shopping, induced the highest feeling of pressure. Moreover, a higher degree of patient's dependence to an individual activity significantly increased perceived burden in care-givers.
We found that use of a formal nurse significantly decreased perceived burden on the care-givers. However, most families cannot afford a paid care-giver, thus increasing emotional and financial strain; hence, society should provide enough support to informal care-givers. Caring for another person may have both positive and negative consequences. It is speculated that sense of coherence is related to health, and how care-givers cope with this stress seems to influence their lives. Caregivers who do not find satisfaction in the caregiving and have a low sense of coherence, need support and intervention in order not to become worn out. ,
We do not know whether the non-participants differed significantly from the participants; it can be assumed that the care-givers who answered were those who were most interested and who were perhaps the healthiest ones. Furthermore, the instruments used in this study for assessing satisfaction, CB and health are not disease-specific, and they have been used in other studies for a variety of diagnoses.
This study demonstrates that the role of caregiving can cause burden among kidney recipients' care-givers. This burden was associated with a variety of factors among this population. For example, we found that using a home nurse can reduce the patients' dependence on the care-giver. This finding helps us to support care-givers with higher burden scores and those who cannot pay for a home nurse. Knowing these factors can help us to prevent or lessen the strain on this altruistic group.
Authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Prof. Guy Neild for his kind help in editing the article. We also thank Dr. Hamid Reza Khoddami Vishte and all who provided data for the study.
|1||Kelly AF, Hewson PH. Factors associated with recurrent hospitalization in chronically ill children and adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health 2000;36(1):13-8.|
|2||Bromley BE, Blacher J. Parental reasons for out-of-home placement of children with severe handicaps. Ment Retard 1991;29(5):275-80.|
|3||Belasco A, Barbosa D, Bettencourt AR, et al. Quality of life of family caregivers of elderly patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48(6):955-63.|
|4||Belasco AG, Sesso R. Burden and quality of life of caregivers for hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(4):805-12.|
|5||Christensen AJ, Wiebe JS, Smith TW, et al. Predictors of survival among hemodialysis patients: Effect of perceived family support. Health Psychol 1994;13(6):521-5.|
|6||Langer SL, Rudd ME, Syrjala KL. Protective buffering and emotional desynchrony among spousal caregivers of cancer patients. Health Psychol 2007;26(5):635-43.|
|7||Razani J, Kakos B, Orieta-Barbalace C, et al. Predicting caregiver burden from daily functional abilities of patients with mild dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(9):1415-20.|
|8||Elmstahl S, Malmberg B, Annerstedt L. Caregiver's burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(2):177-82.|
|9||Ho A, Collins SR, Davis K, Doty MM. A look at working-age caregivers' roles, health concerns and need for support. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2005;(854):1-12.|
|10||Grant G, Nolan M. Informal carers: Sources and concomitants of satisfaction. Health Soc Care 1993;1:147-59.|
|11||Andren S, Elmstahl S. Family caregivers' subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scand J Caring Sci 2005; 19(2):157-68.|
|12||Nolan M, Grant G. Regular respite: An evaluation of a hospital rota bed scheme for elderly people. Ace Books, Age Concern Institute of Gerontology Research Papers, London, UK: 1992.|
|13||Antonovsky A. Unraveling the Mysteries of Health. Jossey-Boss, San Francisco, USA: 1987.|